Wider fish community

Key message

Indicators reflecting species richness and species diversity across the wider fish community varied spatially, however, offshore areas showed a consistent decrease in status. An indicator relating to fish size showed an increase over the assessed area (less than 200 m water depth) that was most pronounced in offshore waters west of Scotland and north of Shetland.

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus).

Background

The assessment of the wider fish community is based on data relating to 167 species collected by the International Bottom Trawl Survey (IBTS) undertaken by Marine Scotland Science and other nations during the first and third quarters of each year. These scientific trawl surveys are used to assess changes in the status of bottom dwelling (demersal) fish communities and to inform fisheries management.

The assessment includes commercial species such as whiting (Merlangius merlangus, Figure 1) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), but also includes many species that are not the target of large commercial fisheries, such as the Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii), Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) and Argentines (Argentina sphyraena). Elasmobranchs, such as the the flapper skate (Dipturus intermedius), are also recorded in the survey.

 

Figure 1d: Whiting © Marine Scotland.
Figure 1a: Short spined sea scorpion eating fish © Lisa Kamphausen, NatureScot.

 

Figure 1c: Male lumpsucker © Lisa Kamphausen, NatureScot.
Figure 1b: Saithe © Lisa Kamphausen, NatureScot.
Figure 1: (top,left) whiting © Crown; (top, right) short spined sea scorpion eating fish, (bottom, left) male lumpsucker, (bottom, right) saithe. © Lisa Kamphausen, NatureScot.

 

The IBTS dataset is ideal for generating quantitative measures of particular characteristics of the fish community, called community indicators, and these can be used to monitor changes in those characteristics over time and over different regions.

Three community indicators are used in the asessment of the wider fish community. Species Richness counts the number of demersal fish species recorded in any survey sample. The Shannon Diversity Index is a measure of the relative abundance of each species in the sample. Together they provide an indication of biological diversity across the fish community. A size indicator, the Large Fish Indicator (LFI), gives an indication of the proportion of large fish in the community that contribute to a balanced ecosystem.

While not all fish species are targeted commercially, they may still be affected through their unintended capture in the net (by-catch). Relevant assessment surveys that target demersal fish are available and these can provide vital data on the status of some rare and potentially at risk species. The assessment of status, here based on IBTS data, uses three community indicators.

The LFI is an indicator used by the UK Marine Assessment and the OSPAR Quality Status Report. In efforts to examine ecosystem state in the North Sea, the LFI is often defined as the proportion of fish greater than a certain length (e.g., 40 cm) in the biomass of bottom trawl survey catches (Engelhard et al. 2015). The higher the value (varying between 0 and 1), the greater the proportion of large fish in the community.

The presence of large fish in fish communities is important because large fish play a role as top predators, are a main target for fisheries, and contribute to a balanced ecosystem. An LFI of 0.3 is considered a target for Good Environmental Status in the North Sea (Engelhard et al., 2015, ICES CM 2015/P:14). 

The two other indicators employed in this assessment provide an indication of biological diversity. Biologically diverse communities are regarded as being more resilient in the face of changing conditions. In the context of a future changing climate, it is therefore important to maintain high values in community indices that reflect diversity.

The need to conserve biodiversity has had a strong influence on the development of an ecosystem approach to managing marine natural resources, and this remains a core aim for the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010. A range of metrics, such as species richness and species diversity metrics, can be applied to survey data to act as indicators of change in demersal fish biodiversity.

The indicators which reflect the composition and structure of the demersal fish community examined in this assessment (Species Richness, Species Diversity and Large Fish Indicator) vary in time and space across Scotland’s waters. Assessments such as this can provide information on how the changes in fish community are affected by fishing pressure over time and are useful for informing future fisheries management from an environmental perspective.

The assessment of the wider fish community also includes elasmobranchs (sharks, skates and rays). Over 30 species of sharks, skates and rays have been recorded in Scottish waters, of which 25 are found in coastal waters. All elasmobranchs share life history characteristics that make them vulnerable to overfishing, which means that once depleted, populations take a long time to recover.

Elasmobranchs (e.g. flapper skate (Dipturus intermedius) (Figure a) are slow growing, late to reach maturity and typically have low fecundity, so the number of individual fish recruited into a population on an annual basis is low. Many aspects of their biology, life history and distribution are poorly studied and many knowledge gaps remain. Single stock assessments of elasmobranchs are not performed. Elasmobranchs are caught as by-catch and are recorded in IBTS and Deepwater trawls surveys. To further establish status in smaller geographical areas, local tagging and tracking surveys and genetic studies are carried out, see Flapper skate case study.

 

Flapper skate, Dipturus intermdedius

Figure a: Flapper skate (Dipturus intermedius).

 

The full range of species used in this wider fish community assessment is shown in Table a.

Table a: Species used in the wider fish community assessment
Scientific Name Common Name
Agonus cataphractus Hooknose
Alosa alosa Allis shad
Alosa fallax Twaite shad
Amblyraja radiata Starry ray
Ammodytidae Sandeel
Anarhichas lupus Catfish
Anguilla anguilla European eel
Arctozenus risso Spotted barracudina
Argentina NA
Argentina silus Greater argentine
Argentina sphyraena Lesser argentine
Argyropelecus hemigymnus Half-naked hatchetfish
Argyropelecus olfersii Hatchetfish
Arnoglossus imperialis Imperial scaldfish
Arnoglossus laterna Scaldfish
Belone belone Garfish
Blennius ocellaris Butterfly blenny
Brama brama Atlantic pomfret
Brosme brosme Tusk
Buglossidium luteum Solenette
Callionymus lyra Dragonet
Callionymus maculatus Spotted dragonet
Callionymus reticulatus Reticulated dragonet
Capros aper Boarfish
Centrolabrus exoletus Rock cook
Cepola macrophthalma Red bandfish
Cetorhinus maximus Basking shark
Chelidonichthys cuculus Red gurnard
Chelidonichthys lucerna Tub gurnard
Chimaera monstrosa Rabbit ratfish
Chirolophis ascanii Yarrell's blenny
Ciliata mustela Five-bearded rockling
Ciliata septentrionalis Northern rockling
Clupea harengus Herring
Coelorinchus caelorhincus Hollow snout grenadier
Conger conger Conger eel
Coryphaenoides rupestris Roundnose grenadier
Cottunculus microps Polar sculpin
Ctenolabrus rupestris Goldsinny wrasse
Cyclopterus lumpus Lumpsucker
Dicentrarchus labrax Bass
Diplecogaster bimaculata bimaculata Two-spotted clingfish
Dipturus batis Blue skate
Dipturus linteus Sailray
Dipturus oxyrinchus Longnosed skate
Echiichthys vipera Lesser weever
Echiodon drummondii Pearlfish
Enchelyopus cimbrius Four-bearded rockling
Engraulis encrasicolus Anchovy
Entelurus aequoreus Snake pipefish
Epigonus telescopus Black cardinal fish
Etmopterus spinax Velvet belly
Eutrigla gurnardus Grey gurnard
Gadiculus argenteus Silvery pout
Gadiculus thori NONE
Gadus morhua Cod
Gaidropsarus argentatus Arctic rockling
Gaidropsarus macrophthalmus Bigeye rockling
Gaidropsarus mediterraneus Shore rockling
Gaidropsarus vulgaris Three-bearded rockling
Galeorhinus galeus Tope
Galeus melastomus Black mouthed dogfish
Galeus murinus Mouse catshark
Gasterosteus aculeatus aculeatus Three-spined stickleback
Glyptocephalus cynoglossus Witch
Gobiidae NA
Helicolenus dactylopterus Bluemouth
Hexanchus griseus Bluntnose sixgill shark
Hippoglossoides platessoides Long rough dab
Hippoglossus hippoglossus Halibut
Labrus bergylta Ballan wrasse
Labrus mixtus Cuckoo wrasse
Lepidion eques North Atlantic codling
Lepidorhombus boscii Four spot megrim
Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis Megrim
Leptoclinus maculatus Spotted snake blenny
Leucoraja circularis Sandy ray
Leucoraja fullonica Shagreen ray
Leucoraja naevus Cuckoo ray
Limanda limanda Common dab
Liparis liparis liparis Striped seasnail
Liparis montagui Montagu's seasnail
Lophius budegassa Black bellied angler
Lophius piscatorius Angler
Lumpenus lampretaeformis Snakeblenny
Lycodes gracilis Eelpout
Lycodes vahlii Vahl's eelpout
Macroramphosus scolopax Longspine snipefish
Macrourus berglax Rough-head grenadier
Malacocephalus laevis Softhead rat tail
Maurolicus muelleri Pearlside
Melanogrammus aeglefinus Haddock
Merlangius merlangus Whiting
Merluccius merluccius Hake
Micrenophrys lilljeborgii Norway bullhead
Microchirus variegatus Thickback sole
Micromesistius poutassou Blue whiting
Microstomus kitt Lemon sole
Molva dypterygia Blue ling
Molva molva Ling
Mullus barbatus barbatus Red mullet
Mullus surmuletus Striped red mullet
Mustelus asterias Starry smooth hound
Mustelus mustelus Smooth hound
Myctophum punctatum Spotted lanternfish
Myoxocephalus scorpioides Arctic sculpin
Myoxocephalus scorpius Bullrout
Myxine glutinosa Hagfish
Nerophis ophidion Straight-nosed pipefish
Pagellus acarne Spanish sea bream
Pagellus bogaraveo Red sea bream
Pagellus erythrinus Pandora
Parablennius gattorugine Tompot blenny
Petromyzon marinus Sea lamprey
Pholis gunnellus Butterfish
Phrynorhombus norvegicus Norwegian topknot
Phycis blennoides Greater forkbeard
Platichthys flesus Flounder
Pleuronectes platessa Plaice
Pollachius pollachius Pollack
Pollachius virens Saithe
Pterycombus brama Atlantic fanfish
Raja brachyura Blond ray
Raja clavata Thornback ray
Raja montagui Spotted ray
Raniceps raninus Tadpole fish
Rostroraja alba White skate
Salmo NA
Salmo trutta trutta Sea trout
Sardina pilchardus Pilchard
Scomber colias Atlantic chub mackerel
Scomber scombrus Mackerel
Scophthalmus maximus Turbot
Scophthalmus rhombus Brill
Scorpaena scrofa Scorpionfish
Scorpaenidae NA
Scyliorhinus canicula Lesser spotted dogfish
Scyliorhinus stellaris Nurse hound
Sebastes mentella Redfish
Sebastes norvegicus Golden redfish
Sebastes viviparus Norway haddock
Serranus scriba Painted comber
Solea solea Dover sole
Sprattus sprattus Sprat
Squalus acanthias Spurdog
Stomias boa ferox Boa dragonfish
Syngnathus NA
Syngnathus acus Great pipefish
Syngnathus rostellatus Nilsson's pipefish
Syngnathus typhle Broad-nosed pipefish
Taurulus bubalis Sea scorpion
Trachinus draco Greater weever
Trachipterus arcticus Dealfish
Trachurus trachurus Horse mackerel
Trachyrincus murrayi Murray's rat tail
Trigla lyra Piper gurnard
Trigloporus lastoviza Streaked gurnard
Triglops murrayi Moustache sculpin
Trisopterus esmarkii Norway pout
Trisopterus luscus Bib
Trisopterus minutus Poor cod
Xenodermichthys copei Bluntsnout smooth-head
Zenopsis conchifer Silvery John dory
Zeugopterus punctatus Topknot
Zeugopterus regius Eckstrom's topknot
Zeus faber John dory
Zoarces viviparus Viviparous blenny

The dataset used for this assessment is the ‘The Groundfish Survey Monitoring and Assessment Data Product (Greenstreet & Moriarty, 2017a, b; Moriarty et al., 2017) derived from the IBTS survey.

The same community indices used in the 2011 Scottish Marine Atlas (Baxter et al., 2011) were applied to this assessment: Species Richness, the Shannon Diversity Index and the Large Fish Indicator. Species richness, diversity and size composition of the demersal fish community were assessed at the scale of ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) statistical rectangles (30 min latitude by 1 degree longitude, or ~ 30 nautical miles by 30 nautical miles). Within the assessment, the ICES rectangles included in the analyses were constrained to those rectangles which fell within the Scottish Marine Regions (SMRs) or Offshore Marine Regions (OMRs). The Faroe Shetland Channel, Bailey, Rockall and Hatton were not included in this assessment as these regions are covered in the deep sea fish assessment.

The Large Fish Indicator (as defined in EC 2010/477/EU) was calculated by taking the weight of demersal fish greater than 40 cm in length divided by the total weight of all demersal fish in each haul. The mean LFI value was calculated at the scale of each ICES rectangle over the time period of interest. Results are presented as descriptions of observations of the community indices plotted on the maps.

To examine trends, two time periods were chosen: 1999 to 2008 and 2009 to 2017. The 1999 to 2008 period was chosen to match the earlier assessment of the demersal fish community (Chapter 4 in Baxter et al., 2011). Mean values of each community indicator were calculated for each ICES rectangle within each of the defined assessment periods.

Results

All three community indicators show some change between the 2009 - 2017 and the 1999 - 2008 assessment periods.

Changes in species richness (Figure 2) and species diversity (Figure 3) are evident across these time periods, but magnitude and direction of this change differs spatially, with offshore areas showing decreases in both cases.

The Species Richness indicator has decreased in many offshore waters, but some increases are seen in some coastal waters between the West Highlands and the Outer Hebrides, north of the Orkney Islands and in coastal waters of North East Scotland.

Species diversity for 2009 - 2017, as indicated by the Shannon Diversity Index, has also increased in coastal waters, particularly around the West Highlands and Argyll, as well as waters around Orkney and the North East region. However, it decreased around Shetland and in many offshore waters.

In contrast to the two indicators relating to species composition, the Large Fish Indicator showed a widespread increase in value across assessed waters between the 1999-2008 and the 2009 - 2017 assessment periods (Figure 4). However, despite these increases, the LFI remains below the GES target of 0.3 (Figure 5) in the majority of cells assessed in 2009 - 2017.

 

Figure 2: The difference in the Species Richness indicator between the 1999-2008 assessment period and the 2009-2017 assessment period.

Figure 2: The difference in the Species Richness indicator between the 1999 - 2008 assessment period and the 2009 - 2017 assessment period.

Blue indicates an increase in the index (greater Species Richness), yellow a decrease (reduced Species Richness), and no colour reflects zero change. All maps show Scottish Marine Regions and Offshore Marine Regions, overlying ICES statistical rectangles. 

 

Figure 3: The difference in the Shannon Index indicator between the 1999-2008 assessment period and the 2009-2017 assessment period

Figure 3: The difference in the Shannon Diversity Index indicator between the 1999 - 2008 assessment period and the 2009 - 2017 assessment period.

Blue indicates an increase in the index (more diversity), yellow a decrease (less diversity), and no colour reflects zero change.

 

Figure 4: The difference in the Large Fish Indicator between the 1999-2008 assessment period and the 2009-2017 assessment period

Figure 4: The difference in the Large Fish Indicator between the 1999 - 2008 assessment period and the 200 9 -2017 assessment period.

Blue indicates an increase in the index (more larger fish), yellow a decrease (less larger fish), and no colour reflects zero change.

 

Figure 5: The Large Fish Indicator in the 2009-2017 assessment period with values above the GES criteria 0.3 in grey shading

Figure 5: The Large Fish Indicator in the 2009 - 2017 assessment period with values above the GES criteria 0.3 in grey shading.

Maps for the individual community indicator values during the 2009 - 2017 and 1999 - 2008 assessment periods for: Species Richness (Figures b and c), Shannon Index (Figures d and e), and the Large Fish Indicator (Figures f and g). All maps show Scottish Marine Regions and Offshore Marine Regions, overlying ICES statistical rectangles. 

 

Figure b: Species Richness of the wider fish community between 1999-2008.
Figure b: Species Richness of the wider fish community between 1999-2008

 

Figure c: Species Richness of the wider fish community between 2009-2017.
Figure c: Species Richness of the wider fish community between 2009-2017.

 

Figure d: Shannon Index of the wider fish community between 1999-2008.
Figure d: Shannon Index of the wider fish community between 1999-2008.

 

Figure e: Shannon Index of the wider fish community between 2009-2017.
Figure e: Shannon Index of the wider fish community between 2009-2017.

 

Figure f: Large Fish Indicator of the wider fish community between 1999-2008.
Figure f: Large Fish Indicator of the wider fish community between 1999-2008.

 

Figure g: Large Fish Indicator of the wider fish community between 2009-2017.
Figure g: Large Fish Indicator of the wider fish community between 2009-2017.

Conclusion

The state of Scotland’s demersal fish community is partly influenced by human activities, such as commercial fishing, as well as factors such as climate change. Recent measures to reduce fishing mortality in Scottish waters have benefitted the demersal fish community (Engelhard et al., 2015). This may be reflected in the increased values for the Large Fish Indicator across assessed waters between the 1999 - 2008 and the 2009 - 2017 assessment periods. Whilst the exact nature of causality may be unclear, the LFI has been shown to be susceptible to changes in a small suite of species (Speirs et al., 2016) being driven by a handful of species rather than the full suite being assessed. It is also likely influenced by climate change (Queiros et al., 2018). Nevertheless, there remains a need for continued monitoring of demersal fish in Scottish waters.

The three indicators assessing the status of the wider fish community all show changes between the two assessment periods: 1999 - 2008 and 2009 - 2017. The magnitude and direction of changes in indicators reflecting species richness and species diversity varied spatially, however, offshore areas showed a consistent decrease in status across both indicators.

The most notable increase in status between the three community indicators examined, in terms of magnitude and spatial coverage, was found in the Large Fish Indicator. The LFI showed an increase in the majority of assessed cells during the current assessment period that was most pronounced in the waters to the west of the Outer Hebrides and around Shetland and north of Shetland. It is noteworthy that the waters to the west of Scotland also had increased values of the species richness and species diversity indicators.

Knowledge gaps

Rarest and perhaps most at risk species are not sampled sufficiently well to permit adequate assessment. Current levels of survey effort limit the applicability of analyses to those species that are adequately sampled at these levels of effort.

Status and trend assessment

A regional traffic light assessment would not be appropriate for the wider fish community given the large scale movement of many species and the conflicting patterns revealed by the indicators in this assessment. As such, only a Scotland wide status is presented.

Region assessed

Status with confidence

Trend with confidence

All Scotland
Status assessment - Grey with green square - Lack of regional evidence/robust assessment criteria, no or few local concerns for some local areas
Confidence assessment - one star
No discernible trend
Confidence assessment - one star

This Legend block contains the key for the status and trend assessment, the confidence assessment and the assessment regions (SMRs and OMRs or other regions used). More information on the various regions used in SMA2020 is available on the Assessment processes and methods page.

Status and trend assessment


Status assessment
(for Clean and safe, Healthy and biologically diverse assessments)
Trend assessment
(for Clean and safe, Healthy and biologically diverse and Productive assessments)
Status assessment - Red - Many concerns

Many concerns

Trend assessment - No or little change

No / little change

Status assessment - Blue circle - Some concerns

Some concerns

Trend assessment - Increasing trend

Increasing

Status assessment - Green - Few or no concerns

Few or no concerns

Trend assessment - Decreasing trend

Decreasing

Status assessment - Green with blue dot - Few or no concerns, some local concerns

Few or no concerns, but some local concerns

No discernible trend

No trend discernible

Status assessment - Green with red dot - Few or no concerns, many local concerns

Few or no concerns, but many local concerns

Trend assessment - all trends
All trends
Status assessment - Blue with red dot - Some concerns, many local concerns

Some concerns, but many local concerns

   
Status assessment - Grey - Lack of evidence/robust assessment criteria

Lack of evidence / robust assessment criteria

   
Status assessment - Grey with green square - Lack of regional evidence/robust assessment criteria, no or few local concerns for some local areas
Lack of regional evidence / robust assessment criteria, but no or few concerns for some local areas    
Status assessment - Grey with blue circle - Lack of regional evidence/robust assessment criteria, some local concerns for some local areas
Lack of regional evidence / robust assessment criteria, but some concerns for some local areas    
Status assessment - Grey with red triangle - Lack of regional evidence/robust assessment criteria, many local concerns for some local areas
Lack of regional evidence / robust assessment criteria, but many concerns for some local areas    

 

Confidence assessment


Symbol

Confidence rating

Confidence assessment - one star

Low

Confidence assessment - two  stars

Medium

Confidence assessment - three stars

High

Figure 8: MCCIP confidence assessment approach.

 

Assessment regions


The Scottish Marine Regions (SMRs; S1 – S11) and the Scottish Offshore Marine Regions (OMRs, O1 – O10)
The Scottish Marine Regions (SMRs; S1 – S11) and the Scottish Offshore Marine Regions (OMRs, O1 – O10)

Key: S1, Forth and Tay; S2, North East; S3, Moray Firth; S4 Orkney Islands, S5, Shetland Isles; S6, North Coast; S7, West Highlands; S8, Outer Hebrides; S9, Argyll; S10, Clyde; S11, Solway; O1, Long Forties, O2, Fladen and Moray Firth Offshore; O3, East Shetland Shelf; O4, North and West Shetland Shelf; O5, Faroe-Shetland Channel; O6, North Scotland Shelf; O7, Hebrides Shelf; O8, Bailey; O9, Rockall; O10, Hatton.

 

Biogeographic, Charting Progress 2 (CP2) Regions. These have been used as the assessment areas for hazardous substances.
Biogeographic, Charting Progress 2 (CP2) Regions. These have been used as the assessment areas for hazardous substances.
Scottish Sea Areas as used in Scotland's Marine Atlas 2011. These are sub divisions of the biogeographic, or Charting Progress 2 (CP2), Regions.
Scottish Sea Areas as used in Scotland's Marine Atlas 2011. These are sub divisions of the biogeographic, or Charting Progress 2 (CP2), Regions.

Links and resources